- 354
- 4 047 627
History Hub
United Kingdom
Приєднався 1 тра 2017
History Hub was created as part of 'Citizens: 800 years in the making', a National Lottery Heritage Fund supported project led by Dr Matthew Smith at Royal Holloway, University of London. It explores the history of liberty, protest, rebellion and reform from Magna Carta to the Suffragettes and beyond.
History Hub has been designed not just as a free resource for schools and colleges but as a space where Royal Holloway students and early career researchers can gain experience in researching, script writing, and presenting educational videos.
Regular contributors have included: Dr Claire Kennan, Dr Steven Franklin, Dr Katie Carpenter, Angela Platt, Elena Rossi, Sam Angell and Dr Michaela Jones.
To learn more about Citizens visit our website or follow us on Twitter @Citizens800, and for more news from the Department of History at Royal Holloway follow @RHULHistory.
History Hub has been designed not just as a free resource for schools and colleges but as a space where Royal Holloway students and early career researchers can gain experience in researching, script writing, and presenting educational videos.
Regular contributors have included: Dr Claire Kennan, Dr Steven Franklin, Dr Katie Carpenter, Angela Platt, Elena Rossi, Sam Angell and Dr Michaela Jones.
To learn more about Citizens visit our website or follow us on Twitter @Citizens800, and for more news from the Department of History at Royal Holloway follow @RHULHistory.
William Gladstone and Home Rule for Ireland
William Gladstone on the question of Home Rule for Ireland.
Performed by Cameron Robertson.
License:
MB01DH6EI6GHJGH
Performed by Cameron Robertson.
License:
MB01DH6EI6GHJGH
Переглядів: 2 631
Відео
The Cold War origins of International Aid
Переглядів 55010 місяців тому
In this video Dr Markus Daechsel introduces the Cold War origins of the story of international development aid in the 1950s.
The Taff Vale Case | Origins of the Labour Party
Переглядів 88011 місяців тому
In this video we explore the significance and legacy of the Taff Vale case, 1900-1902.
Thomas Jackson's pro-magistrate account of the 1819 Peterloo Massacre | Archives Alive: Peterloo
Переглядів 1,5 тис.11 місяців тому
Performed by Gareth Leighton. MB01UXY0OJSMWZY
Dictatorships and authoritarianism in the Islamic World
Переглядів 61211 місяців тому
In this video, filmed in January 2022, Dr Markus Daeschel explores the complex historical reasons why so many countries in the Muslim world have found themselves governed by coercive, authoritarian governments. Thumbnail Image: Bashar al-Assad, CC4.0 www.kremlin.ru
Law and Order in Anglo-Saxon England
Переглядів 3,6 тис.11 місяців тому
In this video Dr Claire Kennan explores how, without a police force, law and order was maintained in Anglo-Saxon England.
Charles I disputes the legality of the Court | The Trial of Charles I, 1649 | The English Civil War
Переглядів 76111 місяців тому
In this video Simon Blake reads some of the arguments Charles I made in his trial for treason and waging war against the people, highlighting how a key tactic of the king was to challenge the authority of the court.
The radicalism of early Christianity | Professor Kate Cooper
Переглядів 1,7 тис.Рік тому
The radicalism of early Christianity | Professor Kate Cooper
The significance and legacy of Henry VIII | A Windsor Castle Story
Переглядів 1,1 тис.Рік тому
The significance and legacy of Henry VIII | A Windsor Castle Story
Loyalist warnings to the Blanketeers marching on London in March 1817
Переглядів 393Рік тому
Loyalist warnings to the Blanketeers marching on London in March 1817
Were the 1960s as permissive as we think? | Dr Stella Moss
Переглядів 447Рік тому
Were the 1960s as permissive as we think? | Dr Stella Moss
How did the Normans win the Battle of Hastings?
Переглядів 1,6 тис.Рік тому
How did the Normans win the Battle of Hastings?
Robert Lowe speaks out against extending the franchise in 1866
Переглядів 1,2 тис.Рік тому
Robert Lowe speaks out against extending the franchise in 1866
The Fall of the Roman Republic and 'the Peace of Augustus' | Professor Kate Cooper
Переглядів 754Рік тому
The Fall of the Roman Republic and 'the Peace of Augustus' | Professor Kate Cooper
The Lyons v. Wilkins case (1896-9) and the Origins of the Labour Party
Переглядів 575Рік тому
The Lyons v. Wilkins case (1896-9) and the Origins of the Labour Party
Working Class opposition to the Great Reform Act 1832 | The Poor Man's Guardian
Переглядів 554Рік тому
Working Class opposition to the Great Reform Act 1832 | The Poor Man's Guardian
The Prison Diary of Perpetua | Recovering Women's Stories in the Ancient World | Prof. Kate Cooper
Переглядів 397Рік тому
The Prison Diary of Perpetua | Recovering Women's Stories in the Ancient World | Prof. Kate Cooper
What is the Domesday book? | The Norman Conquest
Переглядів 9 тис.Рік тому
What is the Domesday book? | The Norman Conquest
Charles I strikes out at Parliament | The attempted arrest of the Five Members on 4 January 1642
Переглядів 752Рік тому
Charles I strikes out at Parliament | The attempted arrest of the Five Members on 4 January 1642
What motivated people to join the Second Crusade? | Professor Jonathan Phillips
Переглядів 1,1 тис.Рік тому
What motivated people to join the Second Crusade? | Professor Jonathan Phillips
The Stamp Act and the origins of the American Revolution | Made with Midjourney V5
Переглядів 4,5 тис.Рік тому
The Stamp Act and the origins of the American Revolution | Made with Midjourney V5
Robert Peel accepts the 1832 Great Reform Act | What was the 1834 Tamworth Manifesto?
Переглядів 1,8 тис.Рік тому
Robert Peel accepts the 1832 Great Reform Act | What was the 1834 Tamworth Manifesto?
Did the Church of England offer a middle path between Protestantism and Catholicism? | Reformation
Переглядів 896Рік тому
Did the Church of England offer a middle path between Protestantism and Catholicism? | Reformation
The force-feeding of Suffragettes by the state | The campaign for Votes for Women
Переглядів 2,8 тис.Рік тому
The force-feeding of Suffragettes by the state | The campaign for Votes for Women
The Matchgirls Strike of 1888 recounted by Annie Besant
Переглядів 1,1 тис.Рік тому
The Matchgirls Strike of 1888 recounted by Annie Besant
Was the Partition of India inevitable? | Professor Sarah Ansari
Переглядів 1,4 тис.Рік тому
Was the Partition of India inevitable? | Professor Sarah Ansari
Glorious Revolution or Dutch Invasion? | 1688 Revisited
Переглядів 8 тис.Рік тому
Glorious Revolution or Dutch Invasion? | 1688 Revisited
Joseph Chamberlain and the 'unauthorised' Liberal election programme of 1885
Переглядів 1,4 тис.Рік тому
Joseph Chamberlain and the 'unauthorised' Liberal election programme of 1885
Origins of the Holocaust | Intentionalism and Functionalism | Professor Dan Stone
Переглядів 5 тис.Рік тому
Origins of the Holocaust | Intentionalism and Functionalism | Professor Dan Stone
Miller No. 1, Prerogative Powers and Parliament | Legal Landmarks
Переглядів 3,6 тис.Рік тому
Miller No. 1, Prerogative Powers and Parliament | Legal Landmarks
Actually, no you don't. You inherit rights from the SOCIETY you live in and the governing laws and regulations. Right now, in many so called democracies, the christofascists, zealots and fanatics, are REMOVING the rights of women, minorities and those who practice other or non religions. If you want to see the future of your 'rights' you need look no further than the Southern states of Americastan: you have NO rights if you aren't a white christian or a woman.
Thank you for remembering the brave Mary.
A huge amount of resentment? In Scotland it caused an armed revolt. Charles should have listened to his father who is quoted as saying "Laud knew not the stomach of that people if he hoped to make that stubborn Kirk stoop more to the English platform ."
What went wrong then?
I am in Pakistan and my religion is Muslim boy 😊😅🎉
You are in which city ,😊please reply and what is your religioun 😅😊😢 please 🙏🥺
www.youtube.com/@HistorywithMissSmith
Excellent teeth . . .appears healthy and fertlie if rather opinionated, hysterical and strident: are her humours in balance and what dowry does she being? 😂
Oooo . . .all those insightful edge lords telling us that we are still serfs living in a feudal society, ruled over by kings and lords are just sisplaying an extraordinary level of ignorance ABOUT feudalism . . . . . .in the comments section of a video explaining the decline of said feudalism. Dont you guys have a MAGA rally to attend? Now THATS feudalism right there.
I just want to point out how awesome it is, that we get to see our founders like they're in a J.K. Rowling series.
Women want their rights. Which rights? The ones men have! Why? Because men have them! Will you earn those rights, as men had to? No, we deserve at zero effort and danger, because men have won them we should have them too!
A homosexual civil union is easily distinguishable from a marriage. Marriage since time immemorial has been understood as the union between a man and a woman, not a man and a man.
Ask the Irish what they think about Oliver Cromwell.
Wow, great video! The visuals and period art really helped illustrate the ideas. I appreciate also that they started with the simple view and then complicated it with the more nuanced contemporary view by historians.
Anyone using this to study for exams??
Incredibly made videos, this is AMAZING 🎉
Thank you for posting. The eloquent and concise writing of James I/VI and the reading by James Parsons gave me a better understanding of how James I kept his throne and his son Charles I did not.
“All children survived in 1st and 2nd class” The Allison girl:
Educated, charismatic and endowed with leadership skills. It was an opportunity to create liberal democracy, knowing Monarchy was a bizarre notion of the divine right of Kings.
The lord protetor of Jews hahahaha
im cooked
me too bro
real shit
He climbed the top of the greasy pole 😂
GENIUS CONTENT DOMO ARIGATO
ありがとうございます
I love 19th Century women! They were amazing! Such sweet little muffins 😊. May those lovely ladies rest in peace 🌹❤️
I have no sympathy for her at all. I don't care.
Women were overwhelmingly against the female vote.
*Charles II may have touched over 100K ill Britons, but legend has it he may have 'touched' twice that number of women...No wonder they call each other today 'luv'.*
If the writer of this knew the extent of starvation of Blacks in Africa, and of their heinous treatment by their own chiefs and Arabs (the only ones usually allowed beyond the coast of Africa at that time) he would realise why so many blacks asked to be slaves and to be taken away. William Cobbett and others were viewing the situation at the time, not 2 centuries later when a lot of people have some chance of possibly improving their lives without slavery (although what do you call the impoverished since and now, working for such a pittance that keeping the family together, fed and housed is impossible even on two wages?). Slavery was a living in job, with food, clothes and a roof. Not all slave owners were cruel to them. Far from it. Most valued them because they cost so much, so it made economical sense to look after them well enough that they would remain fit and healthy. Unlike the stolen little white, teenage and adult slaves who - because they weren't paid for - were sold by the traders for so little they were seen as disposable. Those who became the Blackamoors came from a tribe who had suffered severe drought. They had sought slavery to the white Moors, agreeing their slavery would end when they could manage themselves. That is how they became known as Blacker Moors. Whites also were known to ask to work as slaves for other whites and other darker peoples. As for anything he might have said about Jews (no idea what) he certainly spoke out very much against Methodists and some other Christian sects. To quote from an original copy I have of his weekly political register dated August 21 1813, he writes of Methodists "They are lower in the scale of animal life than any people that I ever saw in any country;".... not enough space here to copy more of what he thought of them. I doubt wrote anything similar to that about blacks or Jews. He certainly didn't mince his words, did he? No political correctness with him. He disliked pretentiousness and hypocrisy in those claiming to be religious is all there is to it. He made mistakes and admitted when he knew he had done so, because he was genuine and straightforward enough to admit it. How many politicians do that with all sincerity with true regret nowadays?
Very useful video
Both if truth be told, as many modern historians now find, that some aspects of Cromwell's dark reputation across these islands are not always born out with the facts, but there's no denying the barbarism of his troops in Ireland Cromwell's. Compared to the mass murderer and tyrant Charles Stuart, where due to his intrangance and stubborn refusal to settle or negotiate, leading to the deaths of 10% of his people across two civil wars. The Scottish born Stuarts, James Charles with their ridiculous French notions of the divine right of Kings, weren't used to a powerful parliamentary system, only the Scottish fuedal clan system. Cromwell was tolerant of all other religions, except French and Spanish funded Catholicism, bringing the Jews back to England and tolerance of all other forms of Christianity. He remains in his rightful place outside the British parliament in the tradition of Wilks and Payne in the view of many Londoners
Feminists for military conscription. As soon as you talk about that or paying alimony they can't wait to chain themselves to the kitchen sink and go back tk their traditional gender roles when it suits them.
Can someone explain why rich women were disenfranchised?? The legislation does specifically exclude them in 1832, however, the Municipal Franchise Act 1869 includes propertied women voting for local authorities.
Rich women were disenfranchised in 1832 because society at that time believed that only men should be involved in politics. The 1832 Reform Act specifically said only men could vote, even if women owned property. This was based on the idea that men represented their households, including women. But by 1869, attitudes were starting to change a bit. The Municipal Franchise Act allowed unmarried women who owned property to vote in local elections, but married women were still excluded. This change recognized that women could handle some public responsibilities, but they were still not considered equal to men in the political sphere.
@@lilnemo4099 - Nope, that doesn't add up. Even under Coverture women were held responsible for breaking the law. The husband may have been financially responsible for the family and supporting the wife and children, but women were still considered criminally responsible and therefore autonomous. Rich single women and rich widows could vote for local authorities - so, the gender issues fails.
1430 Act mentioned - Amazing !!
Most honest video I have seen yet!!
Nope - married women were not 'owned' by their husbands in the common law sense. The concept of Coverture placed the wife under her husband's protection. The 'Dowry' or property of the wife was to be managed responsibly by her husband - it did not become his property. It was marital property. On becoming a widow or via divorce, the Dowry reverted to the woman with all the legal rights involved.
Better than some videos on the same subject matter!
Sylvia the Communist - you can't have Communism without Feminism!
The Suffragettes contributed by handing out white feathers and shaming/bullying young men to their deaths. They gained the vote for rich women - working class women got nothing! Rich women got the vote based on the blood and suffering of over 2 million men! Emmeline Pankhurst - Racist, White Supremacist and Imperialist!
No mention of the Postal Workers burned with Sulphuric Acid from letter boxes then??
The golden rule throughout history if you want a revolution to remove the establish leader, you must have an army behind you. Cromwell had the model Army the precursor to the British professional army.🇬🇧🏴🇬🇧
I just call him Fat Henry because he was an abusive POS whose wives’ legacies have become far more interesting than his own.
If she had a return ticket then she wasn’t intending to get hit. That proves she had intended to put the satchel on the horse and get out with no harm done I’ve been told by everyone she intended to off herself. But who would by a return ticket if they didn’t intend to return
Harriet Taylor - cheater and misandrist!
These videos have saves my history a-level
NIQUE L'OM !!
They wanted reform of parliament as well as deindustrial.
Class 9th students watching this vedio 😂😂😅
Dont tell anybody there is a piece of shit on your head
He made mistakes but e was a good man